Show-Me Missouri Schools
TEACHER WORKFORCE

The people in front of the classroom

Teacher experience shapes everything else in a school. These maps track how the experience of Missouri’s teaching workforce has shifted by district since 1991. For salaries, see the Teacher Pay page; for every view at once, the full explorer.

What this page shows

  • The median Missouri teacher earns 7.5% less in real terms than the median teacher did in 1991. Adjusted for inflation, pay has gone backwards.
  • 45.7% of teachers in the median district hold a master’s degree, and its teachers average 12.6 years of experience.
  • Experience is not spread evenly across the state. These maps show where the workforce has aged, where it has turned over, and where it has thinned.
Data current as of DESE teacher data 2025 DESE enrollment 2025–26 school year
PICK YOUR BASELINE

Experience change from any starting year

Use the Baseline Year control on the map to change the comparison year — it opens on 2024. Red = the district lost experience since your chosen year; blue = it gained.

Choose a baseline year and the map recalculates how the average experience of each district’s teachers changed by 2025. It opens on 2024 to make the latest one-year shift easy to see; move the baseline farther back for a longer view.

Start with the current comparison. In 2025, teachers in the median suburban district average 14.3 years of experience, compared with 12.4 in rural districts and 11.9 in city districts. The map shows how each district moved toward its current average from the year you select.
Red is not a grade. A decline in average experience can follow veteran retirements or a large group of new hires; an increase can reflect retention or a smaller, more experienced staff. The map identifies workforce change. It does not measure teacher quality or explain by itself why the change occurred.
View the numbers as a table
Median district by community type: average teacher experience (2025) and the real change in average pay since 1991 (constant 2025 dollars). 516 mapped districts. Source: our panel (DESE District Faculty Information); community type from NCES locale codes.
Community typeDistrictsMedian experience (yrs)Real pay change since 1991
Rural38812.4−6.8%
Town6912.8−8.3%
Suburb4514.3−10.9%
City1411.9−15.6%
All districts51612.6−7.5%
ADVANCED DEGREES

Where teachers hold a master’s degree

Share of teachers holding a master’s degree or higher, by district, 2025 (Missouri DESE District Faculty Information). Blue = above the statewide median of 45.9%; red = below.

The share of each district’s teachers holding a master’s degree or higher. This is partly about who a district can attract — and partly about what it can afford, since nearly every Missouri salary schedule pays more for an advanced degree. The statewide median district sits at 45.9%.

The gap is geographic, and it is large. The median suburban district has 69% of its teachers holding an advanced degree. The median rural district has 42%. Cities sit at 55%, towns at 52%. At the extremes, Clayton reaches 97% and Valley Park 95%, while a handful of small rural districts — Ridgeway R-V, Risco R-II, Cooter R-IV — report none at all. Read this map next to the Teacher Pay maps: districts that can pay for advanced degrees tend to have them, which is one of the quieter ways that local wealth converts into classroom staffing.
WORKFORCE AND STUDENT OUTCOMES

What workforce capacity does — and does not — predict

Districts with higher teacher salaries, more advanced-degree teachers and more experienced teachers tended to have higher achievement levels in a matched 2009–2019 comparison. They did not tend to have faster learning rates. That distinction is a useful finding, not a verdict on whether teachers or money matter.

+.25 to +.29
correlation of salary, advanced-degree share and experience with achievement level
2009–19 · 516 districts
−.18 to −.02
correlation of those same workforce measures with learning rate
2009–19 · 511 districts
−.65
correlation of historical free/reduced-lunch share with achievement level
2009–19 · 516 districts
What the data show. Workforce capacity is associated with where district students stand academically. After accounting for poverty, enrollment, community type, nonwhite enrollment share, assessed wealth and spending, the three workforce measures together add about 5 percentage points to the variation the model can explain in achievement level. Poverty remains the strongest single correlate.
What the data do not show. The same workforce measures add less than 0.2 percentage point to explained variation in learning rate. Broad current expenditure per pupil is associated with essentially none of the variation in achievement level (r = .00) and only a small share in learning rate (r = .12). Those null relationships do not prove that money never matters.
See the matched 2009–2019 comparisons
Unweighted district-level Pearson correlations. Workforce, spending and poverty measures are district averages for 2009–2019, matched to pooled SEDA outcomes for the same years. Positive means the two measures tend to rise together; negative means one tends to fall as the other rises.
District measureAchievement levelLearning rate
Real average teacher salary+.254−.176
Teachers with a master’s degree or higher+.291−.067
Average teacher experience+.285−.020
Real current expenditure per pupil+.004+.121
Free/reduced-lunch share−.648−.171
Why this is not a causal claim: these are district averages, not individual students and teachers. Salary, credentials and experience overlap with one another and with local conditions; salary and advanced-degree share alone correlate at r = .70. Higher-need and very small districts may spend more because their costs are higher, and current expenditure does not reveal what reached a particular classroom. See the complete design, controls and caveats in Methods.
One comparison is deliberately on hold. The site will not rank districts by out-of-field or less-than-fully-qualified teaching assignments until DESE provides the district-level Screen 20 assignment file and the denominator needed to define the measure consistently. Grouped state summaries cannot support a district comparison by themselves.
WHAT THIS PAGE MEANS

Experience follows the paycheck

The two maps on this page look like they are about years of service and degrees earned. Underneath, they are about the same thing every other page on this site keeps finding: what a district can afford to pay is what a district can attract and keep.

If you’re a parent or student

Your child’s teacher’s years of experience and letters after their name are not a measure of how much your school district values good teaching — they are, to a real degree, a measure of what your district can afford to offer. The median suburban district’s staff averages 14.3 years of experience and 69% hold an advanced degree; the median rural district sits at 12.4 years and 42%.

At the extremes it is stark: Clayton reaches 97% of teachers holding a master’s degree, while a handful of small rural districts report none at all. That gap is not a verdict on how much those communities’ teachers care — it is what a thinner tax base can buy.

If you’re an educator or board member

Certification deserves the same care as salary and experience, but the counting unit matters. A report may describe teachers, courses or assignments, and those are not interchangeable. This site is holding the district comparison until DESE provides the assignment-level Screen 20 file and its denominator rather than turning a grouped statewide summary into a district claim it cannot support.

The Pick Your Baseline tool above is worth running against your own district’s recent history, not just 1991: slide it back five or ten years and you will see whether your staff has gotten more veteran or greener lately — and whether that lines up with a round of retirements, a pay change, or a nearby district hiring your teachers away.

If you’re a policymaker or legislator

These maps are downstream of the funding maps elsewhere on this site. Nearly every Missouri salary schedule pays more for a master’s degree, so a district’s ability to attract and retain advanced-degree teachers is, in practice, a test of its tax base. The 55-point gap between Clayton’s 97% and the districts reporting none at all is a property-wealth gap wearing a credentials costume.

The steepest experience shortfall by community type sits in cities (11.9 years, the lowest of any group) — a reminder that this is not simply a rural-versus-everyone-else story. Urban districts carry their own distinct staffing pressure.

If you’re a taxpayer or community member

If you want to know what your school taxes buy, teacher experience and credentials are as real a return as a new building — they just don’t show up on a bond issue. A veteran, credentialed staff is retained, not conjured; districts compete for it the same way they compete for anything else that costs money.

By community type: rural districts hold their staff to 12.4 years despite 6.8% less real pay since 1991; suburban districts reach 14.3 years against a steeper 10.9% real-pay decline. Experience is not simply about who pays the most today — it is about who pays enough, for long enough, to keep people.

Questions worth asking about your own district
  • How does our district’s teacher experience compare to the statewide median of 12.6 years — and to districts of our own type (rural, town, suburban, or city)? The by-community-type table above has the numbers.
  • What share of our teachers hold a master’s degree, against the statewide median of 45.9%?
  • Has our staff gotten more veteran or greener in just the last five years? Move the baseline tool back five or ten years and see what recent hiring and retirements have actually done.
  • When district assignment data become available, what share of our courses are taught outside the teacher’s certification area — and is that concentrated in particular subjects or schools? Until then, ask what a statewide figure actually counts before using it to judge a district.
  • If our advanced-degree share is low, is that about who applies — or about what our salary schedule can offer once they do? Read this page next to the Teacher Pay page before deciding.
Get in touch